<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is your Web site a silent movie or a talkie?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.agencypja.com/2008/04/18/interactive/is-your-web-site-a-silent-movie-or-a-talkie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.agencypja.com/2008/04/18/interactive/is-your-web-site-a-silent-movie-or-a-talkie/</link>
	<description>Live from the Corner of Bow &#38; Arrow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Holter</title>
		<link>http://blog.agencypja.com/2008/04/18/interactive/is-your-web-site-a-silent-movie-or-a-talkie/comment-page-1/#comment-12520</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Holter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.agencypja.com/2008/04/18/interactive/is-your-web-site-a-silent-movie-or-a-talkie/#comment-12520</guid>
		<description>First, let me state that I respect PJA as an agency that gets their own website right--a rarity in the advertising world. The reason it&#039;s better than most is not because it has &quot;full stereo sound synchronized to movement,&quot; it&#039;s because of its focused content. 

You have accurately identified the problem with most website, especially B2B, that they are too static with infrequent &quot;injections of content.&quot; But let me suggest that your solution is going in the wrong direction. I frequently consult agencies with respect to the &quot;creative barrier&quot; that inhibits their ability to devise robust web strategies. The solution to poor websites is not more Flash, or more pizzaz. It&#039;s better content. Regular, thoughtful, compelling content, like the content PJA regularly adds to their site, is the solution. Not heightened experiences. When it comes to the web, &quot;creative&quot; brand strategies need to take the back seat to &quot;content&quot; brand strategies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, let me state that I respect PJA as an agency that gets their own website right&#8211;a rarity in the advertising world. The reason it&#8217;s better than most is not because it has &#8220;full stereo sound synchronized to movement,&#8221; it&#8217;s because of its focused content. </p>
<p>You have accurately identified the problem with most website, especially B2B, that they are too static with infrequent &#8220;injections of content.&#8221; But let me suggest that your solution is going in the wrong direction. I frequently consult agencies with respect to the &#8220;creative barrier&#8221; that inhibits their ability to devise robust web strategies. The solution to poor websites is not more Flash, or more pizzaz. It&#8217;s better content. Regular, thoughtful, compelling content, like the content PJA regularly adds to their site, is the solution. Not heightened experiences. When it comes to the web, &#8220;creative&#8221; brand strategies need to take the back seat to &#8220;content&#8221; brand strategies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

